Saturday, October 10, 2009

Seawolves Get A Hard 6-1 Lesson

If you play badly against a good team. You'll be made to learn a hard lesson. If you just think of tonight's game in terms of learning opportunities ... then you'd be forced to conclude it was a hugely successful night for the Seawolves. Much learning to be had at the venerable Sully tonight.

Things didn't go well (obligatory understatement). Missed passes were abundant; both due to poor passing and poor catching. Defensive responsibilities were blown left and right. If Michigan had scored every time the coverage in UAA's zone broke down; then we could have seen one of the ugliest losses ever. Bryce pulled their asses out a couple of times. And a couple of times the ugly helmets just blew their chance. There were a couple of good defensive plays made by Seawof defenders. But they generally only had to happen because of a mistake/turnover.

Nothing happened with any consistency for the Seawolves. Nothing. They were never able to generate any sort of sustained offensive pressure outside of the occassional single shift. They were hemmed into their own zone by Michigan's offensive pressure all too often. I wouldn't have expected Red Berenson to allow his team to play like shit for two nights in a row. And they didn't.

I'm going to limit myself here to one specific criticism that I think was a big factor in tonight's outcome. The Seawolves all too often assumed that their first touch was going to be sufficient. The Wolverines didn't ... they knew it would take 2nd and 3rd chances to gain the puck. The Seawolves didn't. So as a result, Michigan generated lots and lots of turnovers. The Seawolves simply lost a LOT of little battles for the puck.

Michigan did also play a positionally strong defensive game. I thought UAA was more effective when a defenseman carried the puck up in transition. When an ugly helmet did turn the puck over in the UAA zone, the Seawolves often found themselves giving it right back up to a perfectly positioned different ugly helmet. Saying they took away time and space is the tried and true hockey phrase coaches use. But I'd go a step further ... they owned the passing lanes.

When that happens ... you'd like to see your team respond by carrying the puck versus trying to make sweet breakout passes. Michigan had our breaking forwards pegged and more often than not disrupted the pass. If UAA completed a first transition pass through the neutral zone, then Michigan disrupted the 2nd.

When the NJ Devils were charging to their first Stanley Cup ... they played exactly the sort of game we saw from Michigan tonight. The Devils often put up a big number on their playoff opponent by owning the passing lanes and scoring off of neutral zone turnovers. Smart, good skating defenseman can attack that sort of play. Lest we forget that two good puck carrying defensemen are out injured. Backstrom's and Hunt's return will improve the transition game. It's also useful that the next two opponents aren't nearly as talented as Michigan.

I think all the freshman forwards could learn a lesson from watching tonights game. They'd get to see the ineffectiveness of their backchecking. They'd notice the ugly helmets standing in front of UAA's crease that they apparently didn't notice when they were actually on the ice. Not to be overly critical, coming up to speed on the defensive side of the game (for a rookie in the WCHA) is common to most everyone. But I can't ignore the fact that it happened often this evening.

I like Chris Crowell's work tonight when the Seawolves did manage possession deep in the Michigan zone. I think I underestimated his foot speed. More than a few times he was really smart off the puck showing good anticipation. It's hard to teach a player anticipation. You either have it or you don't. I'll definitely give him credit for hockey sense. I'd credit Drew Darwitz with a much better game tonight than he had on Friday night.

Nothing I saw tonight from Mitch Bruijsten or Daniel Naslund diminished my hopes for them. Mitch showed a bit of toughness in the corners and in front of the net. Naslund continued to do good things with the puck. I think they both passed up shot attempts. They shouldn't. Kevin Clark's goal is a good example. He could have passed that puck or even waited for something to develop. He didn't though. He shot. He scored. But I think they'll both come up to speed relatively quickly.

Sean Wiles is vying for the "wheels" nickname. He really turns his feet over so much faster than when he got here. He is a threat to break in wide on any team and get to the net. Awesome to see his skating so strong. Craig Parkinson seems to be getting more shot attempts outside the 5ft mark where he says all of his goals come from. And I'm liking his ripping wristers. I like them better when they don't go high or wide. But that's not worth griping about. Not every shot can be perfect. Jade Portwood looked good as usual on the penalty kill and I suspect his play around the opponent's net is going to start paying off more often for him as the season goes on.

I think the new league mandated 3 "official media" timeouts per period is going to have a significant impact on the WCHA this season. I think overall 4th line minutes are going to go down. With a full minutes rest at the bench a lot of coaches are going to skip rolling 4 lines and throw their #1's and #2's back out. It might be early to assume that but it's something I'll be paying attention to as the season goes on.

It's early in the season. It's early in the season. It's early in the season. Those repetitive declarations are for my own benefit. I don't like watching them lose. Like any fan, I want to know "whats up" when they do. It's early in the season. There can be no other reasonable course of analysis but to remind myself of that.

23 comments:

ZZzzz said...

Note to the Seawolves: When you show up to the Sully expecting to play Southern Alberta and instead you play the Michigan Wolverines fresh off a humbling loss to UA_ you’re gonna loose, badly…

Note to Seawolf Freshmen: The team you played tonight is the same team you’ll play for the rest of the season (after next weekend). They’ll just be dressed in different uniforms each weekend…

UAAalumni09 said...

Agreed ZZzzz, the teams in the WCHA are no joke, all of them. Need to show up every night to get some points, and not underestimate any team.

They got next week to figure it out at the banks tourney, hopefully the can start to develop some rhythm. It will be interesting to see which team shows up.

GCI was unable to show the game, despite numerous phone calls to check in to see if it was going to happen, only to hear tech support say "the admins are working on it." Considering the first night went well for GCI, minor problems with audio for half the first, I hope they figure it out how to get the feed up for the rest of the season. Luckily I was able to listen to the game, but regardless of the score, would of preferred to watch it.

Woody in his article stated that the team for 2010-2011 Kendall is Air Force and UND, along with UA_. That should be an great classic since both are respectable programs in their conference.

Anonymous said...

It could have been 10 to 1 easy...lets rebound..this ones done..

Anonymous said...

First off, yes UAA needs to get their heads out of the sand, but I think that at least part of this is due to the stupidity of the Athletic dept. Why are we giving our archrival, virtually every home ice advantage that we have in OUR TOURNAMENT! This is stupid. Let's play the good team when they are more jet lagged. We need people to fill seats on Friday more than Sat. let's put the team that is going to draw more people. Let's give UA_ the Wolverines after we hopefully pissed them off by pulling something out. Sneaking up on a team that is still enamored with being in AK and fighting off Je lag is a huge advantage that any smart Alaskan team would take full advantage of. Why use that advantage on a cupcake team (and yes Suze, Mercyhurst is a cupcake team! Any team in Atlantic Hockey is besides AF and even what they did was a lot of just getting on a good streak and rolling with it and some luck).

K nough ranted on that, well probably not because it has been bothering me for years, it is so obvious. But yeah need to play better!

Anonymous said...

Serious lack of back checking and totally unable to maintain any possession in the Michigan zone. Fan? Do you have the Seawolf goal scorers with you? One goal by Clark and I'm still on the fence whether he should have passed or not. 9 times out of 10 he would have shot anyhow but he did have a teammate wide open. ?? I saw the best effort from the Juniors. I would have sat a few players earlier and played others more toward the end of the 2nd period.

Anonymous said...

Get off the fence. When you score, you have done a good and the right thing. I read decoy. Smart. Nothing wrong with a 6-1 spanking at the hands of a good team smarting from the night before. The first horseshoe goal set the tone for the night. Live and learn. Playing ho-hum SAIT and Mercyhurst to begin the season is enough to lull any team asleep. We will be back. -30-

Bubba said...

Would have, could have, should have. Way to go UAF! Better luck next time Seapuppies.

akhockeyfanatic said...

Learn, move forward and don't dwell on it. It's behind us now we have a whole season of opponents of this caliber ahead of us. This is a good reality check for the newcomers to the team.

The showing of fans was halfway decent Saturday night (in comparison to Friday). I'm just hoping those folks don't make a decision not to attend future games based on that particular game.

And, Bubba, I can't wait for UA_ to play Michigan next time - home or away. It'll be worth me to fork out the money to watch any of those games! I'm wishing you good luck right now in that slaying.

See you in Fairbanks, Seawolves, and good luck! History has a habit of repeating itself! Make a note of that, Bubba.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if the Seawolves tried to skate with Michigan as their game seemed to be more free flowing than when Fairbanks played them. Michigan probably didn't have their best game against UA_, but Fairbanks also seemed to put the clamps on Michigan defensively.

Perhaps the Seawolves shouldn't have tried to skate with the more skilled Wolverines.

Anonymous said...

When I watch every team in the wcha I see the top five scorers on the ice in the last five minutes.
Our team sit clark, lunden, grant and parkinson and baldwin.
The game is not over to the final buzzer, und will put out there top five, as will michigan.
Maybe we are saving these guys for next year. All four forwards are in the top 20 in points after two games in the wcha. We should never let a team blow us out 6 to 1, put out your guns and go for 1 to goals to show the freshman the games is never over.

Anonymous said...

49 should never play the puck... ever, bad bad bad

Anonymous said...

Saying 49 should never play the puck is just stupid. It was a bad bounce on the ice behind the net. Did you not see the quick up passes he made to stretch guys at the far blue? Bryce plays the puck great and will continue to do so, one bad bounce is not enough to warrant a never play the puck again statement. Pull your head out...

Anonymous said...

I agree, Bryce is an excellent puck handler. The first goal was just one of those bad bounces. I doubt it will happen again. He is an asset to the team in net because he acts as a third defenseman.

Having said that, Olthuis looked very solid this weekend as well, and I think Shyiak will continue to split their duties in net.

Anonymous said...

The game last night is worrisome because the Wolves could not contain Michigans speed. What do you think starts in two weeks in the WCHA. Again generating 16 shots is embarrasing. You can only give up 25 but 15 are grade A chances. You can pull at straws about being positive but last night was anything but troublesome. You better come up with more than dump and cycle for your offenxive approach if you want to reach the heights of 4through 6 in the WCHA standings.

Anonymous said...

Bryce was not the problem last nite, use the seniors on the penalty kill and power play. All the top teams in the wcha do. Offence wins games in the wcha, these players have played 4 years here now, when bourne was here he played offence and defense. When you play the top 5 teams, use yor seniors and juniors. Lot's of time to experiment with the new players. Keep the game close and don't let up the third period.

Learn from this game.

Suze said...

I believe Denver has had all five forwards on the ice for their power plays.

When you say to play all the seniors on the PP and PK, that's pretty hard to do when two of your defensemen are seniors who are recovering from injuries.

Anonymous said...

They always start clark on the point at the start of the year, when defenseman are hurt or not ready on the powerplay, I am sure clark would prefer to be on forward but as a senior and a co-captain he does what is best for the team. He was involved in four of the first four goals against merychurst when he was on.
Let him get his 40 to 50 points and set up others.
Remember the coach sets the lineups,we may not agree or do the players but it is a team game.

All the best against fairbanks.

Anonymous said...

Saw some of the skeletons from the not so distant past throw open the closet door. Spot the opposition a goal their 1st or 2nd venture up the ice. More often than not it seemed, outlet passes, made without immediate pressure, that sail wide or are flubbed up ice. The observation of Paul Crowder's dad after the Northeastern, I think, game last year to the effect that a team just isn't going to win with .864 (JohnyO) and .769 (Brice) save percentages, whatever the causes.

One game and stuff happens. The snooze delay's already been hit, though.

WhiteBeard

Anonymous said...

Goalies do not win hockey games, the team does, the team who scores the most goals win, 1 goal will not win you a hockey game. A little to early to crucify our goalies, backstrom and hunt would have slowed up Michigan forwards.
Remember we could have matched lines better and cleared players from in front of our net.
We switched up our power play units from friday. The opposition was 0 for 7 on friday, and we had 2 power play tallies friday. Why do we switch what was working.

Anonymous said...

Last year und had a freshman goalie and struggled to get out of the gate. The team must play tough, and out work there opponents to be successful. I never want to see the team blame the goalies for a loss. When you are being out shot and outskated.
Look in the mirror, we has seniors and juniors who have been through this before, pull up your socks.
We have the talent and experience to be in the middle of the pack.

fan

Anonymous said...

UAF fan here, just throwing in my two cents regarding #49's puck handling - I remember thinking numerous times that I liked how he played the puck back up to the skaters, I thought a couple of times it put Michigan in a tough spot when they were trying to make a line change, and at the very least he helped them get it into the attacking zone faster. That one own-goal was just a fluke, probably didn't realize the Michigan skater was coming up behind him, or he probably would've stayed in his crease. They're fast and can sneak up on you like that. I'm sure he wishes he could have that one back, but I wouldn't really fault him for it.

Regarding UAF vs. UAA defensive handling against Michigan, yes I think Michigan looked better against UAA than UAF, and considering they were probably pissed about the night before, that doesn't surprise me. But, I also thought that UAA played the body too much, to the detriment of playing the puck. They'd check a Michigan player into the boards rather than knock the puck away, and another Michigan player would swoop in and carry it away. UAF didn't do much checking, but they gave the Michigan players no room to work with, and were constantly knocking the puck away, generally making it hard for Michigan to do as much effective passing and cycling. Admittedly this view could be altered through blue-and-gold colored glasses, but that's my take on it.

That said, UAA looks to be another solid team this year. Best of luck from, oh, after next weekend until sometime in February ;)

Anonymous said...

Another UAF fan here, and I must say, I agree with the previous comment. UAA really sticks to WCHA style hockey, hitting people left and right and not playing the puck. I agree with Donald in saying that the Seawolves earned a hard lesson, and hopefully they did. They got schooled by a team that was faster, and a very well oiled machine that stood up to UAA's brute force with efficient passing and good forechecking.

Also, can someone explain to me the "UA_" comment? I'm not sure who started it, or what the joy is for you Anchorage folk behind it, but I have a feeling it has to do with our athletic department claiming the "University of Alaska Nanooks" flagship moniker.

Suze said...

The UA_ thing was indeed started when Fairbanks decided to remove the name of their city - instead going with U of A.

When UAA beat up on UA_ in the Gov Cup, someone on USCHO left me rep saying UAA kicked the F out of UAF.

It stuck.

Post a Comment